|
Post by willtreadway on May 28, 2008 14:42:36 GMT -5
...discuss.
|
|
ttkk
Recently Dead
Posts: 3
|
Post by ttkk on Jun 6, 2008 20:42:32 GMT -5
It sucks big zombie balls. Terrible. I could elaborate, but frankly I don't want to have to recall the cinematic abortion of Diary....
|
|
eswtg
Horror Fiend
Posts: 79
|
Post by eswtg on Jun 9, 2008 8:59:46 GMT -5
It was very bad. Not that I know much about film making but they seemed to do well with the low budget however it was a good idea (roughly speaking) let down by bad acting, stupid plot, ill-advised comedy attempts, a lack of seriousness generally, neither one thing or another, gimicky and adolescent. GAR made a superb trilogy but has seemed to lose his mind, his artistry and a lot of respect in the last couple of years. Shame!
|
|
|
Post by In the Mouth of Shattered on Jun 15, 2008 20:25:15 GMT -5
I enjoyed it, but it's certainly the worst zombie film he's made. My opinion tends to change from day to day, depending on that day's loyalty to Lord George, but. . . today. . . it's not as good as it should've been.
|
|
|
Post by Matttttttttttt on Jun 25, 2008 14:14:52 GMT -5
6/10
I was really looking forward to this one and was let down by how mediocre it was. I agree with Shattered that it's his worst zombie film. The message of the film was way too obvious throughout and it overshadowed everything else going on. The performances were terrible and the movie felt like a DTV zombie flick that anybody could have made. It just didn't have that Romero feel to it.
|
|