|
Post by pain93 on Jun 25, 2008 11:42:47 GMT -5
Better late than never right?
Seriously, it was an alright movie. I expected it to be more serious but it wound up being entertaining but very cliched. 7/10
|
|
|
Post by Matttttttttttt on Jun 25, 2008 14:34:36 GMT -5
This is one of those movies that I absolutely loved right after I saw it. After a few days though, I asked myself, "Why the hell did I like it so much?" That happens to me sometimes with movies. I'll initially love a movie shortly after seeing it, but the appreciation for it will fade if it wasn't really that great. Like you said, it was very cliched and typical Hollywood nonsense. I second your rating of 7/10.
|
|
|
Post by shadowslasher on Jun 25, 2008 16:17:41 GMT -5
Holy crap you're late lol.
Well, I thought it was pretty mediocre. There were a few flaws and it started to become repetitive real quick. But somehow, it kept me entertained and the performances were really good. 6/10
|
|
|
Post by pennywise666 on Jul 9, 2008 11:05:02 GMT -5
I thought it was crap 5/10
|
|
|
Post by In the Mouth of Shattered on Jul 9, 2008 11:45:56 GMT -5
I thought it was crap 5/10 Are you kidding? 21 was great! Best gambling film since Rounders. Then again, I actually know a member of the MIT team (he used to play cards at my club in Pittsburgh). And I've been very much into blackjack for most of my life. But, yeah, I loved it. 8/10.
|
|